Skip to main content

Request By:

Bullock Funeral Homes
461 Elm Street
Ludlow, Kentucky 41016

Opinion

Opinion By: Robert F. Stephens, Attorney General; By: Walter C. Herdman, Assistant Deputy Attorney General

This is in answer to your letter of March 22 in which you raise the question as to whether or not you would be entitled to continue as a member of the Board of Adjustments of the city of Ludlow under the following conditions:

"1. My residence was on the 2nd floor of our funeral home at 461 Elm Street from July 10, 1949 until I moved to 3 Beechwood Rd., Ft. Mitchell, Ky., on Dec. 12, 1976.

"2. My wife and I own 461 Elm Street, 455 Elm Street, 463 and 465 Elm Street, all adjoining property to the funeral home. My son, Dan, now occupies the apt. we vacated and is connected with our business.

"3. I am currently employed at the Bullock Funeral Home and spend most of my working hours in this business."

Your question involves the residential requirements for membership on the Board of Adjustments pursuant to KRS 100.217. This statute provides for the appointment of members of the board but does not require that members selected to represent the city be residents of the city. As a matter of fact, no residential requirements are found under this statute.

A similar question was raised with respect to membership on the planning and zoning commission in OAG 76-560 [copy attached]. This opinion points out that KRS 100.133 [which controls the membership of the joint planning commission] contains nothing that would require members representing the various cities to legally reside within the city and concluded that a nonresident of the city could be selected to represent the city.

The facts you have related concerning your residence would indicate that you legally reside in Ft. Mitchell, Kentucky, though you retain property in the city of Ludlow under the principles governing legal residence. We will not go into these principles since we believe that legal residence in the city is not required under KRS 100.217.

Since there are no residential requirements for membership on the Board of Adjustments, the appointing authority could select a member who is a nonresident of the city.

LLM Summary
OAG 77-206 addresses the question of whether a person who has moved out of a city but still owns property and works there can continue to serve on the city's Board of Adjustments. The opinion concludes that residency in the city is not a requirement for board membership, referencing OAG 76-560 which dealt with a similar issue regarding the planning and zoning commission. The decision clarifies that the statute governing the Board of Adjustments does not stipulate residential requirements for its members.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1977 Ky. AG LEXIS 572
Cites (Untracked):
  • OAG 76-560
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.