Skip to main content

Request By:

Commissioner Bruce Montgomery
Department of Parks
Capital Plaza Tower
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601

Opinion

Opinion By: Robert F. Stephens, Attorney General; By: Thomas C. Jacobs, Deputy Attorney General

By letter of July 26, 1977 you have asked this office to reconsider its opinion expressed in OAG 77-340 concerning the interpretation of what constitutes a "public place" in connection with rights of inspection of certain deputy sheriffs.

This matter has been discussed with your counsel, Mr. Robert H. Penn, and it is now our opinion that OAG 77-340 took an approach much too marrow and same is hereby modified as follows.

It is the opinion of Mr. Penn that if a banquet room is rented for a dinner or dance or other similar use, which is open to the general public for an admission fee, then the room would constitute a public place. We agree.

However, you state that you have always assumed that, if that same banquet room was rented to a given corporation or organization for a regional sales convention or meeting, and admission to the room was limited solely to the salesmen, officers, or other persons associated directly with that company or organization, and entrance could not be gained by members of the general public, then it would in fact be a "private" room. You feel that this is a valid and important distinction and that such decisions with regard to accessibility must be made on a case by case basis each time the facility is rented. We agree.

The basis for a determination as to whether or not a meeting room is private or public is to be determined on an ad hoc basis with reference to the purpose for which the room is being used. If the room is being used for a public function, open to public entrance, then it certainly is open to public inspection by the sheriff and his deputies. In the alternative, if the room is rented to a private organization for a private purpose and access is limited to only those persons associated with the private renting organization, then the room is a "private room" and access to the outside public, including the sheriff and his deputies, is not permitted.

We apologize for the unduly strict construction applied in the earlier opinion and hope that this letter will resolve any doubts raised by same. We regret any inconvenience our earlier correspondence may have caused you and your staff in the Kentucky State Park System.

LLM Summary
The decision modifies a previous opinion (OAG 77-340) regarding the interpretation of what constitutes a 'public place' in the context of inspection rights of deputy sheriffs. The Attorney General's office now agrees that the classification of a room as public or private should be determined on a case-by-case basis, depending on whether the room is open to the general public or restricted to a specific group or organization. The decision clarifies that if a room is rented for a public function and is open to public entrance, it is subject to public inspection. Conversely, if the room is rented to a private organization for a private purpose with restricted access, it is considered a private room, and public inspection is not permitted.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1977 Ky. AG LEXIS 218
Cites:
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.