Skip to main content

Request By:

Mr. Rodney A. Miller
City Attorney
311 Main Street
Fulton, Kentucky 42041

Opinion

Opinion By: Robert F. Stephens, Attorney General; By: Charles W. Runyan, Assistant Deputy Attorney General

The city of Fulton (4th class), Kentucky, is interested in entering into a contract with the city of South Fulton, Tennessee. The Kentucky-Tennessee state line is a common boundary between the two cities. They wish to assist each other from time to time when there is a need for additional fire trucks and/or equipment and one of the cities is unable to combat a fire with all of its own equipment. You ask how this can be legally accomplished.

KRS 75.050, in connection with mutual aid contracts, is restricted to Kentucky counties.

We concluded in OAG 76-243 that the fiscal court of Boyd County can contract with a West Virginia city to answer fire calls in Boyd County under the Home Rule Statute, KRS 67.083. However, the Supreme Court has recently declared the statute unconstitutional. See Fiscal Court of Jefferson County v. City of Louisville, Kentucky (76-604) [decided September 16, 1977].

It is our opinion, however, that under the Interlocal Cooperation Act, KRS 65.210 through 65.300, the two cities can enter into a valid mutual aid contract relating to use of fire fighting staff and equipment.

Such a contract must adhere to the requirements of KRS 65.250 and be submitted, when in final form, to the Attorney General of Kentucky and to the Attorney General of Tennessee. When the contract has been fully accomplished or signed, the original agreement should be sent to the Attorney General of Kentucky, along with copies of the minutes of the two legislative bodies authorizing the agreement. Tennessee has adopted an "Interlocal Cooperation Act", very similar to the Kentucky legislation. See Tennessee Code Annotated, Volume 3A, §§ 12-801 through 12-809. See ibid., § 12-804, as amended in 1973.

As Dr. Roy Owsley said in his article, "The Kentucky Interlocal Act", 51 K.L.J. 22, "Reduced to simplest terms, it permits [the Interlocal Act] two or more public agencies to do jointly or cooperatively anything they are empowered to do separately or unilaterally."

LLM Summary
The decision in OAG 77-632 addresses the legality of the city of Fulton, Kentucky, entering into a mutual aid contract with the city of South Fulton, Tennessee, for fire services. It explains that while previous statutes used for such agreements have been declared unconstitutional, the Interlocal Cooperation Act provides a valid framework for these cities to legally cooperate. The decision outlines the requirements for such a contract under Kentucky law and notes the similar legislation in Tennessee.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1977 Ky. AG LEXIS 142
Cites (Untracked):
  • OAG 76-243
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.