Skip to main content

Request By:

Mrs. Ellis A. Merrifield, Clerk
Kentucky Board of Tax Appeals
Capital Plaza Office Tower
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601

Opinion

Opinion By: Robert F. Stephens, Attorney General; By: Martin Glazer, Assistant Attorney General

You ask two questions concerning representation before the board. They are:

"1. Where the county attorney is representing an individual or corporation as attorney in an appeal from the Board of Assessment Appeals to this Board?

"2. Where the Property Valuation Administrator and/or an employee of the Department of Revenue is representing the state and county in an appeal from this Board of Assessment Appeals to this Board, the county attorney either being unable or declining to represent the state and county, and where the Property Valuation Administrator and/or employee of the Department of Revenue is not an attorney?"

As you noted, we wrote in OAG 77-665 that unless the claimant is representing himself, the representative must be an attorney.

Where the county attorney has a conflict and cannot represent the Commonwealth before the board, then the fiscal court or the county attorney pursuant to KRS 133.120(7) should appoint a substitute attorney to do so.

As to question #2, KRS 132.460 requires the PVA to attend all hearings before the Board of Tax Appeals. The purpose there is to have him testify and be examined on the nature of his assessment, etc. It was not meant to make him eligible to act as an attorney in which he asks himself questions and conducts the case for the Commonwealth. However, if he is an attorney, he could do so. If he is not, either the county attorney or a substitute attorney must present the Commonwealth's side of the case.

It appears from your several questions that the present statutory procedure does not appear to be adequate to handle appeals. Since the legislature is now in session, you may wish to consider offering statutory amendments to remedy the situation so that the Board can always have adequate legal representation for the Commonwealth on their appeals.

LLM Summary
The decision addresses questions regarding legal representation before the Kentucky Board of Tax Appeals, specifically when there are conflicts of interest or when non-attorneys are involved. It reaffirms the requirement that representatives must be attorneys unless the claimant is representing himself, as previously stated in OAG 77-665. The decision also suggests that legislative amendments may be necessary to ensure adequate legal representation for the Commonwealth in appeals.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1978 Ky. AG LEXIS 627
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.