Skip to main content

Request By:

John D. Sims, Esq.
Robertson County Attorney
Mt. Olivet, Kentucky 41064

Opinion

Opinion By: Robert F. Stephens, Attorney General; By: Thomas R. Emerson, Assistant Attorney General

This is in reply to your letter stating that the City of Mt. Olivet, a city of the fifth class, would like to hire the county sheriff to patrol the city's streets during the evening hours. You state that the city cannot afford the services of a full-time policeman and it is interested in providing some incentive for the sheriff to patrol city streets when he is not otherwise occupied with his duties as sheriff.

Municipal corporations in Kentucky possess only such powers as are expressly granted, or necessarily implied, in statutes constitutionally enacted.

Juett v. Town of Williamstown, 248 Ky. 235, 58 S.W.2d 411 (1933). Pursuant to KRS 95.700 the city legislative body of a fifth class city is authorized, by ordinance, to establish a police department for the city, appoint its members, and provide for their number, grades, compensation and regulation. There is no statute permitting a fifth class city to provide police services for the city by contracting with groups or individuals, including the sheriff.

In OAG 71-477, copy enclosed, we concluded that cities of the fifth and sixth classes must utilize the statutory provisions of KRS Chapter 95 to provide police protection and services for their citizens. Those cities cannot contract with special local peace officers for police services. (The statute pertaining to special local peace officers, KRS 61.360, has since been repealed anyway.) We direct your attention to OAG 71-477, at page two, where we said in part as follows:

". . . It is also settled that when the Legislature confers a power upon a subordinate body to be performed in a specified manner, there is an implied restriction upon the exercise of the power in excess of the grant.

Johnson v. Correll, Ky. 332 S.W.2d 843 (1960). See also

Jefferson County v. Jefferson County Fiscal Court, 269 Ky. 535, 108 S.W.2d 181, 183 (1937);

Bruner v. Jefferson County Fiscal Court, 239 Ky. 618, 40 S.W.2d 271, 273 (1931) . . . ."

A sheriff, of course, is a county officer (see OAG 74-917, copy enclosed) while a city police officer is a municipal officer (see OAG 74-781, copy enclosed) . KRS 61.080(3) prohibits a person from filling a county office and a municipal office at the same time.

Therefore, it is our opinion that a city of the fifth class has no statutory authority to provide police services for the city by contracting with the sheriff to provide such services. The city must follow KRS 95.700 if it decides to establish a police department and provide police protection in the city. Furthermore, even if the city utilizes KRS Chapter 95, the county sheriff cannot at the same time serve as a city police officer as those two offices are incompatible.

LLM Summary
In OAG 78-107, the Attorney General responded to an inquiry from the Robertson County Attorney regarding whether the City of Mt. Olivet, a fifth class city, could contract with the county sheriff to patrol the city streets. The opinion concludes that a fifth class city must follow statutory provisions in KRS 95.700 to establish and regulate a police department and cannot contract with the sheriff for these services. It also clarifies that a sheriff, as a county officer, cannot simultaneously serve as a city police officer, citing distinctions made in previous opinions.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1978 Ky. AG LEXIS 614
Cites (Untracked):
  • OAG 71-477
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.