Skip to main content

Request By:

Mr. Sidney Taylor
Third District Magistrate
McCreary County Courthouse
Whitley City, Kentucky 42653

Opinion

Opinion By: Robert F. Stephens, Attorney General; By: Thomas R. Emerson, Assistant Attorney General

This is in reply to your letter raising a question concerning the appointment of a water district commissioner. You state that the county judge/executive nominated three persons for the position, all of whom were rejected by the fiscal court. You ask whether the senior magistrate or the superintendent of the water district may recommend and appoint a water district commissioner.

We direct your attention to KRS 74.020(1)(a), dealing in part with the appointment of water district commissioners, which provides:

"If a district lies wholly within a single county, or operates as a single county district as provided in paragraph (c) of this subsection, the board of commissioners shall consist of three (3) residents of the district, or of any incorporated or unincorporated area served by the district in the county in which the district was originally established, who shall be appointed by the county judge/executive with the approval of the fiscal court. . . ." (Emphasis added.)

Note the provisions of KRS 74.020(2) concerning vacancies:

"Vacancies shall be filled by the same appointing authority which is empowered to make the original appointment. Vacancies resulting from cause other than expiration of the term shall be filled for the unexpired term only."

Furthermore, in multi-county water districts the board of commissioners of such districts shall be appointed by the county judge/executives with the approval of the fiscal courts of the concerned counties. See KRS 74.020(1)(b).

Thus, regardless of whether you are concerned with a single county water district or multi-county water district or an original appointment or an appointment to fill a vacancy, the appointment process is the same. The statute states that a water district commissioner shall be appointed by the county judge/executive with the approval of the fiscal court. See OAG 78-215, copy enclosed. There is no statutory authority for such an appointment to be made by a magistrate, acting unilaterally, or by the superintendent of the water district. The county judge/executive will have to keep recommending and nominating persons for the position until a name is submitted which meets the approval of the fiscal court. The appointment procedure is a joint process involving the county judge/executive and the fiscal court and the statute contemplates an appointment acceptable to both.

LLM Summary
The decision clarifies the appointment process for water district commissioners, stating that the authority to appoint lies with the county judge/executive, subject to the approval of the fiscal court. It specifies that neither the senior magistrate nor the superintendent of the water district has the statutory authority to make such appointments. The decision emphasizes the joint nature of the appointment process between the county judge/executive and the fiscal court, and that the process must continue until a nominee is approved by the fiscal court.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1978 Ky. AG LEXIS 387
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.