Skip to main content

Request By:

Mr. Harold N. Taylor
Daviess County Sheriff
Courthouse
Owensboro, Kentucky 42301

Opinion

Opinion By: Robert F. Stephens, Attorney General; By: Charles W. Runyan, Assistant Deputy Attorney General

Your question reads:

"Is a guard employed by the sheriff in transporting a prisoner to the state penitentiary entitled to compensation from the state?" The answer is "yes".

In OAG 78-528 we concluded that under KRS 64.070, as amended by S.B. 163 [Ch. 162, 1978 Acts, § 1], the payment of mileage to guards is no longer provided for by that statute. However, that opinion did not reach the question that you now present.

KRS 64.070(1)(a) provides generally that an officer conveying a prisoner to the penitentiary shall be paid out of the state treasury the rate per mile paid state employes for official travel in privately owned vehicles, as established by regulation of the executive department for finance and administration, to be calculated by the nearest traveled route, "and shall be paid all actual necessary expenses for feeding, lodging and transporting the prisoner. " (Emphasis added). In subsection (5) of that statute it is provided that the number of guards employed in conveying prisoners to the penitentiary or from one (1) county to another shall not exceed one (1) for every two (2) prisoners. Where only one (1) prisoner is conveyed no guard shall be employed, except that the circuit judge may appoint one (1) guard for each prisoner to the nearest railroad station.

It is our opinion that under the plain language of the statute an "employed" guard is entitled to compensation for his services to be paid out of the state treasury. Of course, the guard cannot be paid on a mileage basis because the language "for himself and for each guard employed" was deleted from the statute by H.B. 10 [Ch. 12 of the Extraordinary Session, 1976, § 12].

Since the statute as it now reads makes no precise mention of the monetary amount of such compensation, the only practical application of this statute would be that the Department for Finance and Administration will have to arrive at a reasonable compensation for such guards employed that reduces to a reasonable hourly rate of pay. Once a reasonable hourly rate of pay is established, it can be applied uniformly. As a matter of comparison and as a matter of guideline, see KRS 64.348, relating to hourly rates for sheriffs and other law enforcement officers for attending court.

LLM Summary
In OAG 78-617, the Attorney General clarifies that a guard employed by the sheriff for transporting a prisoner to the state penitentiary is entitled to compensation from the state, despite the removal of mileage payment provisions by earlier legislation. The decision references OAG 78-528 to indicate that the previous opinion did not cover this specific issue, and it further explains the current statutory provisions regarding the compensation of such guards.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1978 Ky. AG LEXIS 220
Cites (Untracked):
  • OAG 78-528
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.