Skip to main content

Request By:

Mr. James S. Secrest
Allen County Attorney
Box 35
Scottsville, Kentucky 42164

Opinion

Opinion By: Robert F. Stephens, Attorney General; By: Charles W. Runyan, Assistant Deputy Attorney General

One of your magistrates is considering employment as manager of the local quarry operation of state contracting and stone company. The county purchases its crushed stone from that company.

You seek our opinion as to whether such employment would run afoul of KRS 61.220.

KRS 61.220 prohibits any member of fiscal court from becoming interested, directly or indirectly, in any contract for material to be furnished to the county.

Under the assumption that a pecuniary interest of the magistrate in question in the county contract can be traced [the financial implications of this contract in the payment of the magistrate's salary as quarry manager], KRS 61.220 would be violated if he were to accept such employment. Commonwealth v. Withers, 266 Ky. 29, 98 S.W.2d 24 (1936). We agree with the advice you gave to that effect.

Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1979 Ky. AG LEXIS 584
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.