Skip to main content

Request By:

Robert N. McLeod, M.D.
Children's Clinic
401 Bogle Street, Suite 102
Somerset, Kentucky 42501

Opinion

Opinion By: Steven L. Beshear, Attorney General; By: Robert L. Chenoweth, Assistant Deputy Attorney General and Chief Counsel

You have asked the Office of the Attorney General to consider the issue of tuberculin testing for pre-school children. You referenced the consideration of this subject by the State Board of Education. You further brought to our attention the provisions of KRS 214.034. Your question is whether the State Board of Education may, by regulation, make it permissible rather than mandatory that pre-school children be tested for tuberculosis.

The school law provision relevant to this matter is KRS 158.036 which reads as follows:

"(1) Except as otherwise provided in KRS 214.036, effective the beginning of the 1976-1977 school year for a two year period no child shall be eligible to enroll as a student in any public or private elementary or secondary school without first presenting a certificate from a duly licensed medical or osteopathic physician stating that the child has been tested for tuberculosis according to regulations of the department for human resources. Thereafter, such schools determined to have an enrollee infection rate of five-tenths of one percent or higher shall be required to comply with the provisions of this section.

"(2) Such schools determined to have a proven enrollee infection rate below five-tenths of one percent are exempt from the provisions of this section except that the secretary of the department for human resources may require tuberculin skin tests to be administered according to the provisions of this section at five year intervals.

"(3) The governing body of private and public schools shall enforce the provisions of this section." (Emphasis ours.)

Thus, it can be seen from this language that it is no longer statutorily required that children be tested for tuberculosis unless a school is determined to have an enrollee infection rate of five-tenths of one percent or higher. We believe it is important to point out in 1976 right after this provision became law, this Office determined that "enrollee" meant initial enrollment in the school system or transfer into the school system. See OAG 76-256, copy attached.

Our review of the law relative to your inquiry cannot end with school law statutes. KRS Chapter 214 covers the subject of communicable diseases. KRS 214.034 requires, unless excepted from its provisions under KRS 214.036 (medical or religious objection) that, ". . . all parents, guardians, and other persons having care, custody or control of any child shall have the child tested for tuberculosis. . . ." This required testing is to be done in accordance with regulations adopted by the Department for Human Resources. While the Department for Human Resources has adopted regulations setting out schedules for active immunization of normal infants and children against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio myelitis, rubeola (measles) and rubella which immunization is also required under KRS 214.034, unless excepted for medical or religious reasons, we can find no regulation setting up a testing schedule for tuberculosis. See 902 KAR 2:060. Nevertheless, we believe the important point to be made is that it is mandatory by law that children are to be tested for tuberculosis and, of course, treated if the child is found to be infected with tuberculosis.

Therefore, in view of the above, it is apparent that although it is principally no longer required that a child have been tested for tuberculosis as a condition to be met before enrolling in school, and the state board could so recognize this fact by appropriate regulation, the law does clearly still require that all children are to be tested for tuberculosis. Even absent a required schedule for tuberculosis testing, we are of the opinion children should be so tested before enrolling in school for the first time.

LLM Summary
In OAG 82-131, the Attorney General addresses the question of whether the State Board of Education can make tuberculosis testing for pre-school children permissible rather than mandatory. The decision discusses the statutory requirements and historical interpretations, specifically referencing OAG 76-256 to clarify the definition of 'enrollee' as it was understood in 1976. The opinion concludes that while it is no longer required for children to be tested for tuberculosis as a condition for school enrollment, the law still mandates tuberculosis testing for all children.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1982 Ky. AG LEXIS 517
Cites (Untracked):
  • OAG 76-256
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.