Skip to main content

Request By:

Michael L. Moreland, Esq.
Estill County Attorney
108 Main Street
Irvine, Kentucky 40336

Opinion

Opinion By: Frederic J. Cowan, Attorney General; Thomas R. Emerson, Assistant Attorney General

Your letter concerns fire protection services in rural areas. The proposal concerns the merger of the Estill County, Irvine and Ravenna fire departments. You ask whether such a merger is possible and under what statutory authority.

While there are statutory provisions dealing with the merger of contiguous cities [KRS 81.410 to KRS 81,440] and constitutional provisions relative to abolishing and dividing counties [Sections 63 - 65], we know of no authority for various city and county governments to simply merge their fire departments into one unit.

There is a statutory enactment, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, KRS 65.210 to KRS 65.300, which permits local governments to engage in joint or cooperative undertakings. The cities and the county could possibly utilize these provisions to more effectively and efficiently deliver fire protection services in the areas involved. See OAG 79-574 and OAG 79-309, copies of which are enclosed.

In regard to your second question, KRS Chapter 75 deals with fire protection districts and KRS 75.010(2) provides as follows:

In no event shall any fire protection district or any volunteer fire department district include within its metes and bounds any territory at that time or thereafter included in any city of this Commonwealth which maintains a 'regular fire department, ' and which has paid its proportionate share of the indebtedness incurred while such territory was a part of that district.

The phrase "regular fire department" is not defined anywhere in KRS Chapter 75. It is defined in KRS 95.010(3)(b) for purposes of certain sections of KRS Chapter 95 as "one having a fixed headquarters where firefighting apparatus and equipment are maintained, and where firefighters are in constant and uninterrupted attendance to receive and answer fire alarms." KRS Chapter 95 deals with city police and fire departments.

In OAG 69-373, copy enclosed, this office concluded that under KRS Chapter 75 a fire protection district could annex and levy a fire tax on property within a city if the city did not have a "regular fire department" within the meaning of KRS 95.010(3)(b) . See also OAG 73-662, a copy of which is enclosed.

LLM Summary
OAG 90-134 addresses the query regarding the possibility of merging fire departments in Estill County, Irvine, and Ravenna. It explains that there is no direct statutory authority for merging city and county fire departments into one unit but suggests that the Interlocal Cooperation Act could be utilized for cooperative undertakings. The opinion also discusses the conditions under which a fire protection district can annex areas and levy taxes, particularly in cities that do not have a 'regular fire department' as defined by state law.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1990 Ky. AG LEXIS 162
Cites (Untracked):
  • OAG 69-373
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.