Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Chris Gorman, Attorney General; Amye B. Majors, Assistant Attorney General

OPEN RECORDS DECISION

This matter comes to the Attorney General on appeal from the Kentucky State Penitentiary's response to Mr. Delmar Patty's July 17, 1992, request to inspect certain records in the Penitentiary's custody. Those records are identified as his "[p]sychological review and or evaluations from 1-24-91 through 7-16-92." Mr. Patty, an inmate at KSP, indicates that he was allowed to inspect portions of his psychological file on August 12, 1992, but that much of the information therein had been deleted. He objects to these actions, which he characterizes as "censorship," and asks that the Attorney General review KSP's response.

This Office has been advised by Ms. Betty Stuart, Offender Records Specialist at KSP, that Mr. Patty was notified on July 20, 1992, that his request had been referred to the treatment staff and warden for review, pursuant to KRS 61.878(1)(j), now codified as KRS 61.878(1)(k), and KRS 197.025. Portions of Mr. Patty's file were subsequently deemed to constitute "a threat or harmful to [him]," and the remaining portion released for inspection.

On the facts presented, and in view of OAG 92-25 (copy enclosed), we find that KSP's actions were entirely consistent with the Open Records Act. In OAG 92-25, at p. 3, we upheld a correctional facility's invocation of KRS 197.025 to authorize nondisclosure of psychological evaluations, observing:

This provision, which is incorporated into the Open Records Act by operation of KRS 61.878(1)(j) [now KRS 61.878(1)(k)], prohibiting the disclosure of records or information made confidential by enactment of the General Assembly, precludes release of psychological evaluations pursuant to Corrections Cabinet policy and procedure.

We believe that this opinion, to the extent that it relates to the substantive issues Mr. Patty raises, is dispositive of the present appeal.

Mr. Patty may challenge this decision by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882.

LLM Summary
The decision addresses an appeal by Mr. Woodrow N. Dunn regarding the partial denial of his request to inspect the non-confidential portion of his inmate file by the Kentucky Department of Corrections. The decision follows the precedent set in OAG 92-56, which requires an inmate to specify the documents they wish to inspect. The decision upholds the Department of Corrections' partial denial based on this requirement.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
1992 Ky. AG LEXIS 230
Cites:
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.