OAG 87-24 is cited in the decision to support the principle that correspondence expressing personal opinions and recommendations, such as a letter from a judge to the Parole Board, is not subject to public inspection unless it becomes part of the final decision of the Parole Board. This precedent is used to justify the nondisclosure of a similar type of correspondence in the current case, where the letter is from a private individual and contains opinions and recommendations.
OAG 87-24 was Followed by 93-ORD-001
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.