This citation is used to clarify the interpretation of the term 'correspondence' in KRS 61.878(1)(h). The decision explains that 'correspondence' should not be broadly interpreted to include telephoned messages that are written down, aligning with the interpretation provided in 94-ORD-020.
94-ORD-020 was Followed by 94-ORD-045
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.