96-ORD-176 is cited to explain the previous stance of the Attorney General's office on the privacy of customer billing records and the balance between public interest and privacy. The decision discusses how this previous ruling applies to the current case but distinguishes the situation of the Kroger Company due to its specific contractual agreement with the city, which subjects it to greater public scrutiny.
96-ORD-176 was Followed by 96-ORD-237
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.