This citation is used to illustrate a case where a city's bare assertion was insufficient to satisfy the statutory burden of proof under KRS 61.878(1)(h), supporting the decision that LFUCG similarly failed to justify withholding the tape.
95-ORD-029 was Cited by 98-ORD-031
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.