This citation is used to support the decision's conclusion that correspondence with a private contractor regarding a public contract cannot be exempt from disclosure under KRS 61.878(1)(i). The decision follows the reasoning in 99-ORD-220, which held that applications for racing licenses could not be considered private correspondence.
99-ORD-220 was Followed by 00-ORD-098
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.