This case is cited to support the argument that the closed session was not justified under KRS 61.810(l)(f) because it did not involve a member or employee of the Richmond Board of Ethics. However, the decision explains that the previous cases did not turn on the issue of whether the personnel matter involved a member or employee of that particular agency, but rather on whether the personnel matter involved appointment, discipline, or dismissal.
97-OMD-124 was Cited by 01-OMD-018
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.