This citation is used to distinguish the current case from 99-ORD-220, where the Kentucky Racing Commission improperly relied on an exemption in denying a request for applications for racing licenses. The decision explains that the circumstances in 99-ORD-220 are different from the current case because neither Crown Castle nor Cingular is a contractor with a governmental agency, and the correspondence they exchange with the City carries no expectation of favorable action by the City that will inure to their benefit.
99-ORD-220 was Cited by 01-ORD-222
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.