Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficient advised, we find that the Anderson Circuit Court Clerk did not violate the Open Records Act in the disposition of Charlotte Jackson's request for records relating to case number 01-CI-00381. We believe that 98-ORD-6, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling. Although 98-ORD-6 deals with records generated by and for the court in a criminal action, that decision firmly establishes that all court records, both civil and criminal, are not governed by the Kentucky Open Records Act, including the copying fee provision found at KRS 61.874(3). Disputes concerning access to court records, and the reasonableness of the copying fees imposed, must be presented to the court.

In addition, we find that an open records appeal is not the appropriate forum for resolution of a dispute concerning the Kentucky Supreme Court's disposition of a request to correct "clerical errors" appearing in court records.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Charlotte JacksonP.O. Box 603545Cleveland, OH 44103-0545

Jan Duncan Rogers, ClerkAnderson Circuit CourtAnderson County Courthouse151 South Main StreetLawrenceburg, KY 40342

LLM Summary
The Attorney General's decision finds that the Anderson Circuit Court Clerk did not violate the Open Records Act in handling Charlotte Jackson's request for records related to a specific case. It references 98-ORD-006 to affirm that court records are not subject to the Open Records Act and that disputes over access and fees for these records should be addressed by the courts. Additionally, it clarifies that open records appeals are not the proper forum for disputes about clerical errors in court records.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Charlotte Jackson
Agency:
Anderson Circuit Court Clerk
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2003 Ky. AG LEXIS 253
Cites:
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.