Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

The question presented in this appeal is whether the Kentucky Labor Cabinet violated provisions of the Open Records Act in the disposition of Lydia C. Kendrick's September 11, 2002 request for access to the occupational safety and health investigative file pertaining to Music Construction, Inc. For the reasons that follow, and based on the authorities cited, we affirm the Cabinet's partial denial of Ms. Kendrick's request.

In a response dated September 16, 2002, Labor Cabinet paralegal Margaret Goodlett Miles notified Ms. Kendrick, paralegal for the firm of Golden & Walters, that portions of the investigative file would be withheld. Specifically, Ms. Miles indicated that the Cabinet would not disclose preliminary worknotes and correspondence with private individuals contained in the file under authority of KRS 61.878(1)(i) and (j). In addition, she stated that "information identifying employees contacted and/or interview statements has been removed pursuant to KRS 338.101(1)(a)."

Shortly thereafter, Attorney Michael T. Davis, Golden & Walters, on behalf of Ms. Kendrick and his client, Danny Smith, initiated this appeal, challenging the Cabinet's refusal to release the entire file.

We are asked to determine whether the Cabinet's partial denial of Ms. Kendrick's requests constituted a violation of the Open Records Act. For the reasons that follow, we conclude the Cabinet properly withheld portions of the investigative file under authority of KRS 61.878(1)(i), (j), and the information identifying employees contacted and/or interview statements pursuant to KRS 338.101(1)(a), in tandem with KRS 61.878(1)(l).

Among the public records that may be excluded from public inspection in the absence of a court order authorizing inspection are those identified at KRS 61.878(1)(i) and (j) as:

Preliminary drafts, notes, correspondence with private individuals other than correspondence which is intended to give notice of final action of a public agency.

Preliminary recommendations and preliminary memoranda in which opinions are expressed or policies formulated or recommended.

It is well settled that an occupational safety and health compliance officer's worknotes generated in the course of an investigation of a work site, and containing preliminary drafts of possible citations, along with the compliance officer's observations and opinions, may properly be withheld under authority of KRS 61.878(1)(i) and (j). OAG 92-90; 92-ORD-1441; 93-ORD-38.

It is equally well settled that employee interview statements that were obtained by a compliance officer under authority of KRS 338.101(1)(a), and that are located in the investigative file, are excluded from the mandatory disclosure provisions of the Open Records Act by operation of KRS 61.878(1)(l). The latter provision authorizes agencies to withhold "[p]ublic records or information the disclosure of which is prohibited or restricted or otherwise made confidential by enactment of the General Assembly." KRS 338.101(1)(a) provides:

(1) In order to carry out the purposes of this chapter, the commissioner or his authorized representative shall have the authority:

(Emphasis added.) This office has construed the term "question privately" to extend protection to any statements thus obtained. OAG 82-192; 92-ORD-1442; 98-ORD-190. We believe that these decisions are dispositive of the appeal before us. Any information identifying employees contacted and/or interview statements may be withheld from disclosure pursuant to KRS 338.101(1)(a), in tandem with KRS 61.878(1)(l).

We therefore conclude that the Cabinet's partial denial of the request did not violate the Open Records Act.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceedings.

Distributed to:

Michael T. DavisGolden & Walters, PLLCCCorporate Plaza771 Corporate Drive, Ste. 905Lexington, KY 40503

Margaret Goodlett MilesOffice of General CounselKentucky Labor Cabinet1047 U.S. 127 South, Suite 4Frankfort, KY 40601

Kembra Sexton TaylorOffice of General CounselKentucky Labor Cabinet1047 U.S. 127 South, Suite 4Frankfort, KY 40601

LLM Summary
The decision concludes that the Kentucky Labor Cabinet did not violate the Open Records Act by partially denying Lydia C. Kendrick's request for access to an occupational safety and health investigative file. The Cabinet properly withheld portions of the file under KRS 61.878(1)(i), (j), and KRS 338.101(1)(a) in conjunction with KRS 61.878(1)(l), which allows for the withholding of certain preliminary documents and employee interview statements.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Michael T. Davis
Agency:
Kentucky Labor Cabinet
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2003 Ky. AG LEXIS 108
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.