98-ORD-006 is cited as controlling precedent in the decision, supporting the conclusion that the Casey Circuit Court Clerk did not violate the Open Records Act by not responding to a request for marriage license records, as these records are not maintained by the circuit clerk but by the county clerk. The decision follows the reasoning and conclusion of 98-ORD-006 in determining the applicability of the Open Records Act to the offices of the Court of Justice.
98-ORD-006 was Followed by 04-ORD-231
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.