05-ORD-224 is cited in the decision to support the argument that public figures have a diminished privacy interest, and thus, the public's interest in disclosure is heightened. This decision is used to argue against the Division's reliance on KRS 61.878(1)(a) for redaction of the suspect's identity, emphasizing that the suspect's status as a public figure and the public interest in the investigation outweigh the privacy concerns.
05-ORD-224 was Followed by 06-ORD-052
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.