This citation is used to support the argument that repeated requests for public records do not automatically amount to an abuse of the law, and that public agencies must provide clear and convincing evidence of disruption. The decision cites this case to emphasize that patience and tolerance are expected from public agencies in handling requests.
96-ORD-193 was Cited by 07-ORD-057
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.