Skip to main content
04-ORD-035 is cited to support the argument that even if the Attorney General determines that the Personnel Cabinet did not perfectly comply with the 'adequate reason' requirement of KRS 61.880(1) in responding to Mr. Valentine, the requested documents should not be made available, as there was no substantive error in the denial. However, the decision disagrees with this assertion and finds that the Personnel Cabinet's reliance on KRS 197.025 was misplaced.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Cited
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.