Skip to main content

Request By:
Marvin Phipps, # 176844-H-114-USamuel Givens, Jr., Clerk
Court of Appeals
360 Democrat Drive
Frankfort, KY 40601

Opinion

Opinion By: Gregory D. Stumbo, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the Office of the Clerk of the Court of Appeals is not bound by the provisions of the Kentucky Open Records Act, and therefore cannot be said to have violated the Act in its actions relative to the open records request of Marvin Phipps for a docket sheet for the Court of Appeals case related to # 03-CR-0062 and # 04-CR-0005. We believe that 98-ORD-6, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling. Mr. Phipps must seek redress for his grievance relative to his request for copies of court records through the courts.

This office has consistently recognized that records of the courts are not governed by the Open Records Act. In Ex Parte Farley, Ky., 570 S.W.2d 617, 624 (1978), the Kentucky Supreme Court held "that the custody and control of the records generated by the courts in the course of their work are inseparable from the judicial function itself, and are not subject to regulation." See also York v. Commonwealth, Ky.App., 815 S.W.2d 415 (1991); KRS 26A.200 and KRS 26A.220; and 94-ORD-105.

Accordingly, we conclude the actions of the Office of the Clerk of the Court of Appeals relative to Mr. Phipps' request for a docket sheet for the Court of Appeals related to # 03-CR-0062 and # 04-CR-0005 cannot be said to have violated the terms and provisions of the Open Records Act, as it is not applicable to the records of the court system. Notwithstanding the above, the Clerk advised this office that his office routinely provides docket sheets and has provided Mr. Phipps with a copy of the requested docket sheet.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

LLM Summary
The decision concludes that the Office of the Clerk of the Court of Appeals is not subject to the Kentucky Open Records Act regarding a request for a docket sheet. It relies on precedent that court records are not governed by the Open Records Act, specifically citing 98-ORD-006 as controlling. The decision also notes that while the Open Records Act does not apply, the Clerk's office provided the requested docket sheet to the requester. The decision affirms that any grievances regarding this matter should be pursued through the courts, not under the Open Records Act.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Marvin Phipps
Agency:
Office of the Clerk of the Court of Appeals
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2007 Ky. AG LEXIS 46
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.