Skip to main content

Request By:
Amy Mischler
Darrel H. Mullins
Kelsey E. Friend, Jr.

Opinion

Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the Pike District Court is not bound by the provisions of the Kentucky Open Records Act, and therefore cannot be said to have violated the Act in its actions relative to the open records request of Amy Mischler to two Pike County District Judges for copies of "all documents in Terry Thompson's personnel file which have his written signature." We believe that 02-ORD-24, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling. Because the Pike District Court is not bound by the provisions of the Open Records Act, per the legal authorities referenced in 02-ORD-24, the decision whether to release the requested documents rests with Court.

This office has consistently recognized that records of the courts are not governed by the Open Records Act. In Ex Parte Farley, Ky., 570 S.W.2d 617, 624 (1978), the Kentucky Supreme Court held "that the custody and control of the records generated by the courts in the course of their work are inseparable from the judicial function itself, and are not subject to regulation." See also York v. Commonwealth, Ky.App., 815 S.W.2d 415 (1991); KRS 26A.200 and KRS 26A.220; and 94-ORD-105.

Accordingly, we conclude that the actions of the Pike District Court relative to Ms. Mischler's request for certain court records cannot be said to have violated the terms and provisions of the Open Records Act, as it is not applicable to the records of the court system.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

LLM Summary
The decision concludes that the Pike District Court is not subject to the Kentucky Open Records Act and therefore did not violate the Act in its handling of a request for documents from a personnel file. The decision relies on previous opinions and statutory provisions that exempt court records from the Open Records Act, affirming that the decision to release court records rests solely with the court.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Amy Mischler
Agency:
Pike District Court
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2008 Ky. AG LEXIS 47
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.