Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

At issue in this appeal is whether the Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in failing to issue a written response upon receipt of Jaron S. Teague's written request(s) for various records, including, but not limited to, "the mental evaluation reports ordered at [Kentucky Correctional Psychiatric Center]," and the "entire criminal docket sheets" for specified case numbers. On appeal, Mr. Teague argues that the Clerk "failed to notify and or [sic] respond for" a list of sixteen (16) named judges and court officers allegedly in possession of the records. Because records in the custody of circuit and district court clerks are properly characterized as court records, which are not governed by the Open Records Act, rather than public records within the meaning of KRS 61.870(2), the Attorney General has long recognized that neither circuit nor district court clerks are subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act. Consequently, the Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk had no statutory obligation to respond on behalf of the named individuals and cannot be said to have violated the Act relative to Mr. Teague's request.

In our view, 98-ORD-6, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling on the facts presented. See 04-ORD-021 (because mental evaluation report prepared at KCPC is "properly characterized as a 'court record' and its distribution has been limited by court order, it is not accessible under the Open Records Act" )(copy attached). "Simply stated, disputes relating to access to court records must be resolved by the court." 98-ORD-6, p. 2.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

LLM Summary
The decision concludes that the Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk did not violate the Kentucky Open Records Act by failing to respond to Jaron S. Teague's request for various records, including mental evaluation reports and criminal docket sheets. It is determined that these records are classified as court records, not public records, and thus are not subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act. The decision follows previous rulings that disputes regarding access to court records should be resolved by the courts themselves.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Jaron Teague
Agency:
Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2009 Ky. AG LEXIS 87
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.