This citation is used to contrast the present case with a previous case where AT&T Mobility Corporation was involved. In 09-ORD-042, there was a reasonable basis to believe that AT&T did business in Kentucky, unlike Kroll in the current case. This helps to establish that Kroll does not meet the criteria for being a public agency under the Open Records Act.
09-ORD-042 was Cited by 09-ORD-223
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.