09-ORD-156 is discussed to distinguish it from the current case. In 09-ORD-156, the Attorney General ruled that an individual charged with a crime had a reduced expectation of privacy in records related to the incident. This decision is cited to clarify that the current case, involving a person who adopted a dog and not charged with any crime, does not meet the same criteria for reduced privacy expectations.
09-ORD-156 was Cited by 10-ORD-011
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.