96-ORD-273 is cited as a precedent where an agency was directed to recalculate its copying fee based on the factors in KRS 61.874(3) due to lack of proof that the actual cost of reproduction was $10.00. This supports the decision's emphasis on recalculating fees to reflect actual costs.
96-ORD-273 was Followed by 10-ORD-022
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.