Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that Kentucky State Reformatory did not violate the Open Records Act by requiring Pasha to adhere to agency policies relating to submission of records requests. This includes the requirement that he pre-pay for copies of "eight progress notes in [his] electronic medical record that were written by Melissa Gaydos . . ." and provide a self-addressed envelope to eliminate confusion about the proper recipient of the pre-paid copying costs. It is the decision of this office that 95-ORD-105 and 08-ORD-044, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference, are dispositive of the issue on appeal. At page 5 of 95-ORD-105 the Attorney General recognized that "an inmate must accept the necessary consequences of his confinement, including policies relating to application for, and receipt of, public records, " as long as "those policies do not interfere, or threaten to interfere, with the inmate's statutory right of access to nonexempt public records . . . ." 08-ORD-044, p. 3, 4; accord 12-ORD-117.

The record on appeal does not support Pasha's claim that he has been denied access to the records identified in his request. KSR stands ready to fulfill that request when Pasha adheres to the agency's policies relating to pre-payment for copies. Under these circumstances, we assign no error to KSR.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Distributed to:

Uriah Pasha, # 092028Marc AbeloveAmy V. Barker

LLM Summary
The decision finds that the Kentucky State Reformatory did not violate the Open Records Act by requiring an inmate to adhere to agency policies for submitting records requests, including pre-payment for copies and providing a self-addressed envelope. The decision references previous opinions to support that such requirements are permissible as long as they do not interfere with the inmate's statutory rights to access nonexempt public records.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Uriah Pasha
Agency:
Kentucky State Reformatory
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2012 Ky. AG LEXIS 214
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.