Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Jack Conway,Attorney General;Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant General

Open Records Decision

The question presented in this appeal is whether the Kentucky Department of Corrections violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in denying inmate Buster Chandler's November 20, 2014, request for a copy of his prison ID card. For the reasons stated below, we find this appeal untimely.

Mr. Chandler's request was denied on December 9, 2014, and his undated appeal was received in this office on January 9, 2015. In the appeal, Mr. Chandler states that he received the denial on December 10, 2014.

On January 23, 2015, Assistant General Counsel Amy V. Barker, Justice and Public Safety Cabinet, responded on behalf of the Department of Corrections. She points out that Mr. Chandler made a previous request for the same item on November 7, 2014, which was denied November 14, 2014. KRS 197.025(3) provides that an inmate must appeal a denial of an open records request within 20 days. In this case, those 20 days after the first denial would have expired before he even received the second denial.

As we decided in 14-ORD-054 (copy attached), a subsequent request for the same records does not revive the appeal rights forfeited by an inmate's previous failure to appeal within the allotted time. We adopt the reasoning in 14-ORD-054 and find Mr. Chandler's appeal untimely due to the expiration of his appeal time from the November 14 denial. Accordingly, we do not reach the merits of the appeal

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

LLM Summary
The decision addresses an appeal by inmate Buster Chandler regarding a denied request for a copy of his prison ID card. The appeal was found to be untimely because it was based on a subsequent request for the same document, and the inmate had previously failed to appeal within the required time frame after the initial denial. The decision follows the precedent set in 14-ORD-054, which states that a subsequent request does not revive the appeal rights lost due to not appealing the initial denial in time.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Buster Chandler
Agency:
Department of Corrections
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 34
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.