11-ORD-176 is cited in the decision to discuss the historical interpretation of KRS 214.556(6) before its amendment. The decision notes that in 11-ORD-176, the Attorney General's Office found that the University of Kentucky interpreted KRS 214.556(6) too expansively by refusing to provide access to existing responsive data that did not describe any readily identifiable person. This citation is used to contrast past interpretations with the current understanding and application of the law.
11-ORD-176 was Cited by 15-ORD-110
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.