Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk is not bound by the provisions of the Kentucky Open Records Act, and therefore did not violate the Act in the disposition of Daryl Shultz's request for a copy of the Motion to Vacate in his case. We believe that 98-ORD-6, a copy of which his attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

LLM Summary
The Attorney General's decision concludes that the Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk is not subject to the Kentucky Open Records Act and did not violate the Act in denying Daryl Shultz's request for a copy of the Motion to Vacate. The decision follows the precedent set in 98-ORD-006, which is cited as controlling in this matter.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Daryl Shultz
Agency:
Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 127
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.