OAG 92-74 is cited to support the principle that a county is not responsible for maintaining a bridge that serves only one private residence and does not serve a public purpose. This opinion is used to establish the precedent that when a county road is altered to serve primarily a private purpose, it should be discontinued as a county road.
OAG 92-74 was Followed by OAG 16-005
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.