Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Gordon Slone,Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

The questions presented in this appeal are whether the City of Owenton (the City) failed to respond to repeated open records requests and whether the City can require a requester with a place of business in the same county to inspect public records at the City Hall. While we cannot definitively resolve the issue of whether the requester received the City's responses to each of his open records requests, the letters provided by the City tend to make it more likely than not that the City timely mailed appropriate responses to the requester. The other issue presented by this appeal is whether the City can require the requester to inspect the public records at the City Hall. As the requester uses an address in Owen County we find that the requester may be required to inspect the records at the Owenton City Hall before requesting copies of the records.

Gerald T. Kemper, attorney at law, filed an appeal with this office by letter dated November 29, 2016. In his appeal, Mr. Kemper provided a letter, dated November 9, 2016, wherein he requested certain records of the City of Owenton and asked to be advised of the costs to provide for delivery of the documents. By a second letter dated November 17, 2016, Mr. Kemper made a request for other records from the City and again requested to be advised of the costs for delivery of the records. In his letter of appeal, November 29, 2016, Mr. Kemper stated that: "This office has received no response either written or oral from the City." Mr. Kemper supplemented his appeal with a letter dated December 12, 2016, where he states that "As of the mailing date of this letter the required response from the agency has not been received." The City of Owenton faxed a response to the Office of Attorney General on December 9, 2016, and attached two letters to the fax. Both letters were addressed to Mr. Kemper at the Owenton address on his letterhead and envelope. The first letter, dated November 15, 2016, stated:

In response to your open records request dated 11/09/2016, and per KRS 61.872(3) the requested records are available for your inspection Monday thru Friday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. -- 12:00 and 1:00 p.m. -- 3 p.m. at City Hall, 220 South Main Street, Owenton, KY 40359.

The second letter attached to the fax was dated November 18, 2016, and stated:

In response to your open records request dated 11/17/2016, and per KRS 61.872(3) the requested records are available for your inspection Monday thru Friday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. -- 12:00 and 1:00 p.m. -- 3 p.m. at City Hall, 220 South Main Street, Owenton, KY 40359.

The City's response to the appeal stated that "These letters were mailed on the dates written by first class mail. The City has not denied Mr. Kemper's request for open records."

Mr. Kemper filed another letter, dated December 19, 2016, with this office, stating:

Enclosed Correspondence from the agency. Them [ sic ] information requested was for copies of archived information with agreement to pay for costs of copies and mailing.

This agency and its personnel is [ sic ] hostile to the request and personal inspection is not advisable. The statute authorizes requests for copies of documents and payment for appropriate charges.

The agency is in violation of the subject statute and attempting to stall for time in avoidance of providing information sensitive to agency employees.

The question of whether a requester can be required to inspect public records at an agency's location, rather than having the records first mailed to him, is determined by KRS 61.872(3):

(3) A person may inspect the public records:

(a) During the regular office hours of the public agency; or

(b) By receiving copies of the public records from the public agency through the mail. The public agency shall mail copies of the public records to a person whose residence or principal place of business is outside the county in which the public records are located after he precisely describes the public records which are readily available within the public agency. If the person requesting the public records requests that copies of the records be mailed, the official custodian shall mail the copies upon receipt of all fees and the cost of mailing.

In 15-ORD-195, this office interpreted KRS 61.872(3) in regards to whether an agency could require a requester to inspect the records at the agency's location when the requester either lived or worked in the county where the agency is located:

Substantively speaking, if the city afforded [the requester] an opportunity to inspect the requested records, it complied with the Open Records Act. The Act does not create a universal right to obtain copies of public records by mail. Rather, the basic right is described in KRS 61.872(2) as "the right to inspect public records. " (Emphasis added.) KRS 61.872(3)(b) gives some applicants the option of obtaining copies by mail instead of inspecting the records, but it is only those applicants whose "residence or principal place of business is outside the county in which the public records are located." From all indications, [the requester] does not fall within this category. Assuming that to be true, the agency could lawfully require him to inspect the records in person and make any copies himself. Cf. 09-ORD-173.

15-ORD-195, p. 5-6.

Mr. Kemper's address on his letterhead and envelope is in Owenton, which is in Owen County and so is not outside the county in which the public records are located. The address on the letterhead and envelope includes the term "Attorney at Law," and so is presumptively the address for Mr. Kemper's law office. The City of Owenton has afforded Mr. Kemper the opportunity to inspect the records. As he has his office in the same county in which the records are located, the City has complied with the Open Records Act and may require him to inspect the records before requesting copies of the records.

Although Mr. Kemper claims that the agency and its personnel are hostile to his request for records, the nature of the hostility is not further described and we are unable to discern from the record that the City has taken any action that would prevent Mr. Kemper from inspecting the records at City Hall.

As to Mr. Kemper's claim that the City did not respond to his Open Records requests, we are unable to definitively state that Mr. Kemper did not receive the City's responsive letters, but we must presume, from the existence of the responsive letters, that the City responded to his requests in accordance with the Open Records Act.

Either party may appeal this decision by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General must be notified of any action in circuit court, but must not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

2016

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 258

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 271

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 272

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 270

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 269

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 266

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 264

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 257

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 267

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 268

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 265

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 263

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 262

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 260

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 261

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 259

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 255

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 252

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 253

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 251

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 254

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 250

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 249

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 248

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 247

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 246

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 245

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 235

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 237

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 243

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 239

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 244

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 238

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 236

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 241

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 240

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 242

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 233

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 234

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 232

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 231

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 256

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 224

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 223

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 225

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 227

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 228

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 226

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 230

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 229

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 222

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 217

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 220

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 218

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 221

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 219

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 215

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 216

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 214

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 212

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 213

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 211

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 210

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 208

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 205

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 206

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 207

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 209

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 204

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 203

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 200

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 202

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 201

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 199

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 198

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 196

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 197

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 195

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 194

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 192

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 190

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 191

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 193

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 186

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 188

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 189

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 187

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 180

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 185

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 181

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 184

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 183

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 182

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 178

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 179

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 176

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 175

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 177

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 174

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 172

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 173

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 170

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 171

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 168

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 166

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 167

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 169

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 165

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 164

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 163

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 162

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 161

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 160

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 159

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 157

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 158

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 156

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 148

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 145

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 154

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 151

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 140

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 146

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 143

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 150

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 153

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 149

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 142

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 155

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 141

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 144

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 152

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 147

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 137

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 138

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 139

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 136

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 133

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 135

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 132

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 134

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 131

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 130

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 128

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 127

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 129

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 126

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 125

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 124

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 123

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 51

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 52

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 53

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 54

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 55

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 47

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 46

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 48

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 49

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 50

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 63

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 62

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 61

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 60

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 59

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 58

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 57

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 56

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 122

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 121

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 45

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 119

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 120

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 116

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 118

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 117

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 113

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 14

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 115

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 114

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 112

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 109

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 111

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 110

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 107

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 105

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 106

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 108

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 104

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 102

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 103

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 13

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 101

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 12

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 100

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 99

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 98

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 97

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 96

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 95

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 94

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 93

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 92

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 91

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 89

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 90

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 88

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 78

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 82

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 85

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 84

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 81

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 86

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 87

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 80

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 83

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 79

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 77

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 74

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 73

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 75

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 76

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 72

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 68

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 69

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 70

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 67

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 66

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 65

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 43

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 44

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 64

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 11

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 42

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 41

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 17

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 40

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 39

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 38

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 36

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 37

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 16

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 35

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 33

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 32

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 34

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 30

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 31

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 29

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 28

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 27

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 26

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 20

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 22

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 24

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 25

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 21

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 23

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 19

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 18

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 15

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 10

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 8

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 9

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 7

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 4

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 5

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 6

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 1

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 2

2016 Ky. AG LEXIS 3

LLM Summary
The decision addresses two main issues: whether the City of Owenton failed to respond to open records requests and whether the City can require a requester with a business in the same county to inspect public records at City Hall. The decision finds that the City likely responded appropriately to the requests based on the evidence of mailed responses. It also concludes that the City can require the requester to inspect the records at City Hall before requesting copies, based on the requester's business location being in the same county as the records. This interpretation follows the guidelines set by KRS 61.872(3) and previous decisions such as 15-ORD-195.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Gerald Kemper
Agency:
City of Owenton
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2017 Ky. AG LEXIS 4
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.