This citation is used to support the argument that concerns about prejudicing witnesses and biasing a jury pool are relevant only where there is a prospective prosecution. The decision discusses how these concerns do not apply in the current case since there is no prospective law enforcement action planned, thus KSP failed to justify withholding the records.
16-ORD-087 was Cited by 17-ORD-233
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.