Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

Noel Mark Botts initiated this appeal by letter dated November 26, 2018, challenging the inaction of the Franklin County Sheriff's Office ("Sheriff's Office") upon receipt of his November 9, 2018, request for "any and all citations issued for vehicles passing school [buses] when the bus was loading or unloading passengers for the last three (3) years" and "any and all documents and information regarding the outcome of the citations issued" relative to the aforementioned offenses. In addition, he requested "any and all documents and information for all persons not charged or who had charges dropped for passing a school bus while" passengers were loading or unloading. This office issued a Notification to Agency of Receipt of Open Records Appeal to Franklin County Sheriff Patrick Melton and Franklin County Attorney Rick Sparks on December 3, 2018, advising that pursuant to 40 KAR 1:030 Section 2, "the agency may respond to this appeal," but any response "must be received no later than December 7, 2018." As of this date, the Attorney General has not received any written response from the agency or its counsel, nor has anyone contacted this office to request additional time in which to submit a response. Neither of the Notifications was returned as being undeliverable. This inaction by the Sheriff's Office constitutes a clear violation of KRS 61.880(1).

As a public agency, the Sheriff's Office must comply with procedural and substantive provisions of the Open Records Act. More specifically, KRS 61.880(1) dictates the procedure that a public agency must follow in responding to requests made under the Open Records Act. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(1):

Each public agency, upon any request for records made under KRS 61.870 to 61.884, shall determine within three (3) days , excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, after the receipt of any such request whether to comply with the request and shall notify in writing the person making the request, within the three (3) day period, of its decision . An agency response denying, in whole or in part, inspection of any record shall include a statement of the specific exception authorizing the withholding of the record and a brief explanation of how the exception applies to the record withheld . The response shall be issued by the official custodian or under his authority, and it shall constitute final agency action.

(Emphasis added.) The language of KRS 61.880(1) "directing agency action is exact. It requires the custodian of records to provide particular and detailed information in response to a request for documents."

Edmondson v. Alig, 926 S.W.2d 856, 858 (Ky. App. 1996). A "limited and perfunctory response" does not "even remotely compl[y] with the requirements of the Act . . . ." Id . See 04-ORD-208; 12-ORD-085. Failing to respond, as the Sheriff's Office did here, violates the mandatory language of the Act.

The Sheriff's Office had two opportunities to fully discharge its duty under KRS 61.880(1); first, upon receipt of Mr. Botts' request, and second, upon receiving the Notification from this office. A public agency such as the Sheriff's Office is not permitted to elect a course of inaction. See 17-ORD-129. The Attorney General has consistently recognized that procedural requirements of the Open Records Act "are not mere formalities, but are an essential part of the prompt and orderly processing of an open records request." 04-ORD-084, p. 3 (citing 93-ORD-125, p. 5); 05-ORD-190; 09-ORD-186; 12-ORD-085. Inasmuch as the Sheriff's Office did not respond to Mr. Botts' request, it necessarily failed to advance a legal argument in support of its apparent denial of that request.

Pursuant to KRS 61.880(2)(c), "[t]he burden of proof in sustaining the action shall rest with the agency. . . ." See Edmondson above. The Sheriff's Office must provide Mr. Botts with a copy of any existing record(s) in the custody of the agency which is responsive to his request unless the Sheriff's Office satisfies its burden of proof by articulating, in writing, a basis for denying access in terms of one or more of the exceptions codified at KRS 61.878(1)(a) through (n). Pursuant to KRS 61.872(3)(b), the "official custodian shall mail the copies upon receipt of all fees and the cost of mailing." 1 If the Sheriff's Office "does not have custody or control" of any records identified in Mr. Botts' request, the Sheriff's Office "shall notify [Mr. Botts] and shall furnish the name and location of the official custodian of the agency's public records." 2 KRS 61.872(4). Compliance with provisions of the Open Records Act "is mandatory, and is as much of a duty owed by a public agency as the provision of other services to the public." 03-ORD-067, p. 2 (citing 93-ORD-125, p. 5); 11-ORD-042; 15-ORD-152. Because the Sheriff's Office did not perform these functions, it violated the Open Records Act. See 09-ORD-186; 10-ORD-093.

Either party may appeal this decision by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court under KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Footnotes

Footnotes

1 If the Sheriff's Office possesses no responsive records, it must promptly indicate as much to Mr. Botts in writing. On this issue, the Attorney General has consistently held:

[A]n agency's inability to produce records due to their nonexistence is tantamount to a denial and . . . it is incumbent on the agency to so state in clear and direct terms. 01-ORD-38, p. 9 [citations omitted]. While it is obvious that an agency cannot furnish that which it does not have or which does not exist, a written response that does not so state is deficient. [Citations omitted.]

02-ORD-144, p. 3; 03-ORD-207. Accordingly, the Sheriff's Office must ascertain whether any existing documents are responsive to Mr. Botts' request, promptly advise him in writing of its findings, and briefly explain the nonexistence of such records, if appropriate.

2 This office has recognized that "it is incumbent on the [public agency] to make reasonable efforts to ensure that an employee who receives a misdirected open records request immediately forwards that request to the agency's official custodian for timely processing, or at a minimum notifies the requester and 'furnish [es] the name and location of the custodian of the public record.' KRS 61.872(4)." 03-ORD-032, p. 2 (emphasis added); 12-ORD-153 (following Baker v. Jones, 199 S.W.3d 749, 752 (Ky. App. 2006)(holding otherwise "would be tantamount to encouraging our government officers to 'bury their heads in the sand' to public matters with which they are charged")); 15-ORD-136.

2018

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 272

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 265

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 266

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 271

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 262

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 263

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 269

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 264

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 267

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 268

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 270

18-ORD-231

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 259

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 260

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 255

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 256

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 258

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 254

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 257

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 253

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 252

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 251

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 250

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 249

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 238

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 248

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 239

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 242

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 244

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 240

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 241

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 243

18-OMD-212

18-OMD-213

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 237

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 236

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 234

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 235

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 247

18-ORD-206

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 228

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 229

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 230

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 231

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 232

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 227

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 226

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 225

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 224

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 223

18-ORD-196

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 221

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 220

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 218

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 219

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 212

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 217

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 216

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 211

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 215

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 214

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 213

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 210

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 209

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 206

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 208

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 207

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 200

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 204

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 205

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 203

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 202

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 201

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 199

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 196

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 197

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 198

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 195

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 194

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 193

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 192

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 191

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 190

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 189

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 188

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 184

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 187

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 186

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 185

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 183

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 179

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 180

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 182

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 181

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 178

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 176

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 177

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 175

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 174

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 173

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 172

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 171

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 170

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 169

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 168

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 164

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 166

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 167

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 163

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 165

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 150

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 149

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 146

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 148

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 147

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 145

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 144

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 143

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 142

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 140

18-ORD-131

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 138

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 137

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 139

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 136

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 128

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 127

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 135

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 129

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 134

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 133

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 132

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 131

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 130

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 123

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 122

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 120

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 126

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 125

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 124

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 121

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 118

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 116

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 117

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 113

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 114

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 115

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 112

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 111

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 109

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 110

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 108

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 107

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 106

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 105

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 102

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 104

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 103

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 101

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 100

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 99

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 98

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 95

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 96

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 97

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 87

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 86

18-ORD-085

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 84

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 89

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 92

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 94

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 91

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 93

18-ORD-079

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 83

18-ORD-078

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 273

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 82

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 81

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 79

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 77

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 80

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 78

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 75

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 76

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 74

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 73

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 72

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 67

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 71

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 70

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 69

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 68

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 64

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 63

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 66

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 65

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 62

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 56

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 58

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 60

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 61

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 59

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 57

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 55

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 54

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 52

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 53

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 50

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 51

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 49

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 119

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 44

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 43

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 36

18-ORD-029

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 46

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 42

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 48

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 35

18-ORD-035

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 41

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 33

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 32

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 39

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 34

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 40

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 38

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 37

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 17

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 18

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 31

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 30

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 29

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 19

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 28

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 27

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 25

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 24

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 26

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 23

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 22

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 20

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 21

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 16

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 13

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 12

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 10

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 11

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 9

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 8

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 7

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 5

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 6

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 4

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 3

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 2

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 15

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 1

2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 14

LLM Summary
The decision addresses the failure of the Franklin County Sheriff's Office to respond to an open records request regarding citations issued for vehicles passing school buses. The Attorney General determined that the Sheriff's Office violated the Open Records Act by not responding to the request or providing a legal basis for denying access to the requested records. The decision emphasizes the mandatory nature of compliance with procedural requirements under the Open Records Act and the duty of public agencies to respond promptly and adequately to requests.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Noel Mark Botts
Agency:
Franklin County Sheriff’s Office
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2019 Ky. AG LEXIS 3
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.