15-ORD-041 is cited to show a precedent where the Kentucky State Police's argument that surveillance video was exempt under the homeland security exemption was not accepted because it did not meet the necessary burden of proof. This case is used to compare and contrast with TARC's similar argument and to support the decision that TARC also did not meet the burden of proof required for the exemption.
15-ORD-041 was Followed by 19-ORD-053
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.