This citation is used to support the argument that without a detailed explanation of the privacy interest at issue, an agency cannot meet its burden of proof under KRS 61.880(2)(c) to sustain its invocation of KRS 61.878(1)(a). The decision uses 16-ORD-057 to emphasize that LPL's failure to provide such an explanation means it has not met its burden.
16-ORD-057 was Cited by 20-ORD-016
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.