Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

The question presented in this appeal is whether KSR violated the Open Records Act ("the Act") in its disposition of a December 30, 2019, request by inmate Jeff Carpenter ("Appellant") for a copy of a check "mailed to [him] from Publishers Clearing House ... and supposedly returned to sender on June 4th, 2019." For the reasons that follow, this Office finds no violation of the Act.

KSR denied Appellant's request on grounds that "inmates are not allowed to have any type of money in their possession," citing Corrections Policy and Procedure ("CPP") 9.6. On appeal, KSR explained that checks are considered "contraband and exempt pursuant to KRS 61.878(1)(1), KRS 520.010(1), [CPP] 9.6, & CPP 16.2." KSR further asserted that the check was "exempt from disclosure pursuant to KRS 61.878(1)(l) and 197.025(1) as a security risk."

KRS 520.010(1) defines "contraband" as "any article or thing which a person confined in a detention facility is prohibited from obtaining or possessing by statute, departmental regulation, or posted institutional rule or order." CPP 9.6 II(B) includes among contraband items "[m]oney, unless authorized in writing by an appropriate institutional staff member for a specific inmate," as well as "[a]nything not authorized for retention or receipt by the inmate and not issued to him through regular institutional channels." 1Furthermore, CPP 16.2 II(E)(11) includes as "Prohibited Mail" any mail containing checks. 2

Regarding prison contraband, the Kentucky Court of Appeals has noted that "[the prison] environment has its own peculiar problems, in that the insignificant and unremarkable can, and do, become magnified in importance."

Commonwealth v. O'Hara , 793 S.W.2d 840, 843 (Ky. App. 1990). In this context, "[t]his Office is not in a position to second guess the Department [of Corrections] regarding its policy and regulation as to what constitutes contraband." 16-ORD-196. See, e.g. , 07-ORD-252 (love letters from inmate to correctional officer properly denied as contraband); 18-ORD-049 (photographs depicting nudity properly denied as contraband). KSR has shown that the check in question here meets the statutory and policy definitions of "contraband."

As to the security risk posed by Appellant's possession of the check, KRS 197.025(1) provides:

In a memorandum attached to KSR's response to this appeal, a KSR representative stated that "[a] check can be used to make counterfeit checks and scam others as well, which is a security risk for staff, inmates, and the public." Furthermore, KSR advised that agency counsel had contacted Publishers Clearing House and was informed that the check and accompanying letter were "a scam and ... not a legitimate letter from PCH." KSR asserted that a further security risk would be created by "[a]llowing documents involving a scam to circulate in a prison."

KRS 197.025(1) affords the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections or his designee "broad, although not unfettered, discretion to deny inmates access to records the disclosure of which, in his view, represents a threat to institutional security." 96-ORD-179. Under the facts presented, KSR has articulated a credible basis for denying Appellant a copy of the check in the interest of security. Accordingly, this Office declines to substitute its judgment for that of the Department of Corrections. 04-ORD-017. KSR properly withheld the record on the basis of KRS 520.010(1) and KRS 197.025(1).

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Footnotes

Footnotes

1 See 501 KAR 6:020 § 1, incorporating by reference Kentucky Corrections Policies and Procedures 9.6, available at https://corrections.ky.gov/About/cpp/Documents/09/CPP%209.6.pdf (last accessed Feb. 5, 2020).

2 See 501 KAR 6:020 § 1, incorporating by reference Kentucky Corrections Policies and Procedures 16.2, available at https://corrections.ky.gov/About/cpp/Documents/16/CPP%2016.2%20Inmate%2… (last accessed Feb. 5, 2020).

LLM Summary
The decision concludes that the Kentucky State Reformatory (KSR) did not violate the Open Records Act when it denied an inmate's request for a copy of a check, citing that the check was considered contraband and a security risk. The decision supports the discretion of the Department of Corrections to restrict access to certain materials deemed contraband or security risks, and it affirms previous decisions where similar items were withheld under the Act.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Jeff Carpenter
Agency:
Kentucky State Reformatory
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2020 Ky. AG LEXIS 21
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.