Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

On June 25, 2020, the Center received an open records request from Jeremy Dunton ("Appellant") seeking copies of six JPay emails he had sent to the Center during a three-month period. The Center denied that request, and Appellant appealed.

Under KRS 197.025(3), an inmate must mail or send the "appropriate documents" to this Office within twenty days of the agency's denial to perfect his appeal. Those "appropriate documents" are set forth in KRS 61.880(2), and include "a copy of the written request and a copy of the written response denying inspection." Because Appellant mailed to this Office a copy of a request and a denial within twenty days of the denial, this Office issued a Notice of Appeal to the Center and invited the agency to respond. See 40 KAR 1:030 § 2. The Center did respond, and submitted proof that the request and denial attached to Appellant's appeal were actually duplicates of an earlier request Appellant had sent on June 15, 2020. The Center denied that first request on June 18, 2020.

This Office finds that Appellant failed to perfect this appeal because he did not attach "the appropriate documents." Appellant was required to attach a copy of his first request dated June 15, 2020, and a copy of the Center's first denial dated June 18, 2020. He was further required to send those documents on or before July 8, 2020, i.e. within twenty days. However, the documents Appellant provided were not the "appropriate" ones. Instead, he attached his second request for the same records that the Center previously denied and the Center's second denial. This Office has held that an inmate may not submit a second, or duplicate, request in an attempt to extend the twenty-day statutory deadline. See, e.g. , 17-ORD-250; 16-ORD-108; and 14-ORD-054. Accordingly, Appellant failed to perfect his appeal and this Office is without jurisdiction to reach the merits of this appeal. 1

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court per KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Footnotes

Footnotes

1 The Center also argues that Appellant's appeal was untimely because this Office did not receive the appeal until more than twenty days after its denial on June 18, 2020. Although we need not address this argument because Appellant failed to perfect his appeal, the Center's assertion is not correct. Under KRS 197.025(3), an inmate initiates an appeal when he mails or otherwise sends the appropriate documents.

LLM Summary
The decision finds that the appellant, an inmate, failed to perfect his appeal regarding an open records request because he did not submit the original request and denial within the required twenty-day period. Instead, he submitted a duplicate of a later request and denial, which does not meet the statutory requirements. The decision cites previous opinions to support this finding and concludes that the office does not have jurisdiction to reach the merits of the appeal.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Jeremy Dunton
Agency:
Northpoint Training Center
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2020 KY. AG LEXIS 427
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.