Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

On December 21, 2021, inmate Eric Cunningham ("Appellant") requested copies of certain messages and images sent by the Appellant to private individuals through the JPay e-mail service. The Complex initially denied the Appellant's request because he had failed to sign it. When the Appellant resubmitted his request with a signature on December 27, 2021, the Complex denied it on the grounds that JPay e-mails are not public records. This appeal followed. 1

In 20-ORD-109, a courtesy copy of which is enclosed, this Office found that JPay e-mails exchanged between inmates and private parties generally are not "public records" under KRS 61.870(2). Here, as in 20-ORD-109, there is no indication in the record that the requested e-mails are "prepared, owned, used, in the possession of or retained by a public agency" within the meaning of KRS 61.870(2). Accordingly, the requested messages and images are not public records and the Complex did not violate the Act when it denied the request. 2

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days from the date of this decision. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of the complaint e-mailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Footnotes

Footnotes

LLM Summary
The decision concludes that the JPay e-mails requested by inmate Eric Cunningham do not qualify as 'public records' under KRS 61.870(2), following the precedent set in 20-ORD-109. The Complex's denial of the request was upheld because the e-mails were not prepared, owned, used, in the possession of, or retained by a public agency. The decision also notes that the appeal was properly perfected and dismisses the Complex's alternative argument regarding the exemption of the records.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Eric Cunningham
Agency:
Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2022 KY. AG LEXIS 23
Cites:
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.