19-ORD-102 is cited to support the decision that the use of body-worn camera footage as evidence in a civil trial is not an 'official purpose' under KRS 189A.100(2)(b)5, and therefore, the Department's denial of the request for such footage was in accordance with the law.
19-ORD-102 was Followed by 22-ORD-072
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.