22-ORD-126 is cited as a precedent for the principle that a public agency cannot require an individual to inspect records at a time unilaterally set by the agency, and that the location offered for inspection must be a 'suitable facility' as defined by the law. This decision is referenced to show that the District's actions in the current case initially subverted the intent of the Open Records Act by setting a unilateral time for inspection and not providing a suitable facility.
22-ORD-126 was Followed by 22-ORD-166
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.