22-ORD-048 is cited in 22-ORD-191 to support the decision that the City's refusal to provide the appellant a copy of its code of ordinances was justified under similar circumstances previously. The decision references the earlier finding that the City had met its burden of proof under KRS 61.872(6) due to the ongoing digitization of the records and the appellant's pattern of behavior regarding record requests.
22-ORD-048 was Followed by 22-ORD-191
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.