Skip to main content

24-ORD-106

April 26, 2024

In re: Glen Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary

Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary
(the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because
the Office cannot resolve the factual dispute between the parties.

Open Records Decision

Between March 8 and March 15, 2024, inmate Glen Odom (“Appellant”)
submitted four requests to the Penitentiary for copies of various records. On March
25, 2024, having received no response from the Penitentiary, the Appellant initiated
this appeal.

Upon receiving a request for records under the Act, a public agency “shall
determine within five (5) [business] days . . . after the receipt of any such request
whether to comply with the request and shall notify in writing the person making the
request, within the five (5) day period, of its decision.” KRS 61.880(1).

On appeal, the Penitentiary claims it timely responded to all four requests and
made available to the Appellant 66 pages of responsive records.1 As proof, the
Penitentiary provides four copies of the requests at issue, with stamps indicating the
dates they were received, and its timely responses to all four requests. The Office has
regularly found it is unable to resolve factual disputes between the parties to an
appeal under KRS 61.880(2)(a), including disputes about whether a requester
received a public agency’s response to his request. See, e.g., 23-ORD-220. Accordingly,

1
The Penitentiary also asserts that the Appellant’s appeal is unperfected because he did not provide
copies of its responses to his requests. However, the Appellant initiated this appeal by claiming he did
not receive a response to any of his requests. When a requester seeks the Attorney General’s review of
a claim that a public agency has failed to respond to a request to inspect records, he need only provide
the Office with a copy of the request to which he claims the agency failed to respond. See
KRS 61.880(2)(a).the Office cannot find the Penitentiary violated the Act because the Office cannot
resolve the factual dispute between the parties as to whether the Appellant received
the Penitentiary’s responses to his requests.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating an action in the
appropriate circuit court under KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days from
the date of this decision. Under KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified
of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in
any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of the complaint
emailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Russell Coleman

Attorney General

/s/ Matthew Ray

Matthew Ray

Assistant Attorney General

#178

Distributed to:

Glen Odom #219489
Michelle Harrison
Stephanie DeFrancesco
Ann Smith

LLM Summary
In 24-ORD-106, the Attorney General's Office determined that it could not find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary violated the Open Records Act due to an unresolved factual dispute regarding whether the appellant, inmate Glen Odom, received responses to his record requests. The decision cites 23-ORD-220 to affirm the Office's inability to resolve such factual disputes in appeals under KRS 61.880(2)(a).
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Odom
Agency:
Kentucky State Penitentiary
Type:
Open Records Decision
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.