Skip to main content

24-ORD-184

August 21, 2024

In re: William Burney/Kentucky State Police

Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Police
(“KSP”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is
unable to resolve the factual dispute between the parties as to whether
KSP received the request for records.

Open Records Decision

Inmate William Burney (“Appellant”) claims that on July 5, 2024, he submitted
a request to KSP for “all the records in [its] possession concerning [his] criminal case.”
The Appellant specified the scope of his request included “DNA, forensic lab
reports/documents, police reports and interviews.” On July 24, 2024, having yet to
receive a response from KSP, the Appellant initiated this appeal.1

Under KRS 61.880(1), upon receiving a request for records under the Act, a
public agency “shall determine within five (5) [business] days . . . after the receipt of
any such request whether to comply with the request and shall notify in writing the
person making the request, within the five (5) day period, of its decision” (emphasis
added). Here, the Appellant claims he submitted a request to KSP on July 5, 2024,
and had not received a response by July 22, 2024. On appeal, KSP states that it did
not respond to the Appellant’s July 5 request because it did not receive it. The Office
has consistently found it is unable to resolve factual disputes between a requester
and a public agency, such as whether an agency received a request to inspect records.
See, e.g., 23-ORD-092; 23-ORD-071; 23-ORD-005; 22-ORD-216; 22-ORD-148; 22-

1
The Appellant’s appeal request is dated July 22, 2024, but the postmark on his appeal is dated
July 24, 2024.ORD-125; 22-ORD-100; 22-ORD-051; 21-ORD-163. Similarly, the Office is unable to
resolve this factual dispute or find that KSP violated the Act.2

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating an action in the
appropriate circuit court under KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days from
the date of this decision. Under KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified
of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in
any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of the complaint
emailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Russell Coleman

Attorney General

/s/ Matthew Ray

Matthew Ray

Assistant Attorney General

#320

Distributed to:

William Burney #143288
Samantha A. Bevins
Stephanie Dawson
Mitchel S. Hazelett

2
KSP asserts that it previously provided the Appellant all requested records in response to a request
it received from him on July 1, 2024. The Appellant did not provide a copy of that request as part of
this appeal. Thus, KSP’s response to the July 1 request has no bearing on the Office’s decision in this
appeal. See KRS 61.880(2)(a).

LLM Summary
In 24-ORD-184, the Attorney General's Office determined that it could not resolve the factual dispute between William Burney and the Kentucky State Police regarding whether the police department received Burney's request for records. Consequently, the Office could not find that the Kentucky State Police violated the Open Records Act.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
William Burney
Agency:
Kentucky State Police
Type:
Open Records Decision
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.