23-ORD-220 is cited as a precedent for the principle that the Office of the Attorney General cannot resolve factual disputes between a requester and a public agency regarding whether a requester received an agency's response to his request. This precedent is used to justify the decision that the Office cannot determine if the Lee Adjustment Center violated the Open Records Act in the case at hand due to the factual dispute about receipt of the response.
23-ORD-220 was Followed by 24-ORD-204
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.