Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-087
23-ORD-087 April 17, 2023 In re: Western States Media/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for automobile collision reports under KRS …
Western States Media — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-135
23-ORD-135 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to make a timely response to two open records requests. Open …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-138
23-ORD-138 June 20, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue responses within five business days of receiving requests …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-207
23-ORD-207 August 9, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld a “preliminary draft” under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-253
23-ORD-253 September 19, 2023 In re: Bill Hollander/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records …
Bill Hollander — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-292
23-ORD-292 November 1, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Metro also violated …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-333
23-ORD-333 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-334
23-ORD-334 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-346
23-ORD-346 December 28, 2023 In re: Nicolas Horne/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to …
Nicolas Horne — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-008
24-OR-008 January 17, 2024 In re: Jessica Thornton/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of a privileged memorandum from its attorney to …
Jessica Thornton — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-012
24-ORD-012 January 17, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision On …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-016
24-ORD-016 January 22, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld an email that was exempt from disclosure under KRS …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-015
24-ORD-015 January 22, 2024 In re: Evan Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”) within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to records …
Evan Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-144
24-ORD-144 June 18, 2024 In re: Bethany Davis/Department of Insurance Summary: The Department of Insurance (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request that did not sufficiently describe the public …
Bethany Davis — Department of Insurance
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-226
24-ORD-226 October 15, 2024 In re: William Sharp/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision …
William Sharp — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-227
24-ORD-227 October 21, 2024 In re: Dante Stone/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to the Jefferson County Circuit Court Clerk (the “Clerk”). Open Records Decision On September 1, 2024, inmate Dante …
Dante Stone — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-237
24-ORD-237 November 12, 2024 In re: Alex Rib/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it required the Appellant to complete a commercial purpose form even though …
Alex Rib — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-031
25-ORD-031 January 31, 2025 In re: Stephen Kininmonth/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Office cannot find that Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it claims to have provided all records …
Stephen Kininmonth — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-030
25-ORD-030 January 31, 2025 In re: Stephen Kininmonth/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that it does not possess. Metro also …
Stephen Kininmonth — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-032
25-ORD-032 February 3, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response within five business days of receiving …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.